Sierra Club Home Page   Environmental Update  
chapter button
Explore, enjoy and protect the planet
Click here to visit the Member Center.         
Search
Take Action
Get Outdoors
Join or Give
Inside Sierra Club
Press Room
Politics & Issues
Sierra Magazine
Sierra Club Books
Apparel and Other Merchandise
Contact Us

Join the Sierra ClubWhy become a member?

genetic engineering

Backtrack
Environmental Update Main
Genetic Engineering Main
In This Section
What's New, Whats News
Genetic Engineering Report
Genetic Engineering Policy
Kraft Campaign
Sources for Non-rBGH Cheese
Genetically Engineered Trees
Take GMOs Out of School Meals!
SIERRA July 2001 biotechnology issue
Marker Assisted Selection
Hunger's Cure?
Privatization of Genetic Wealth
Letter opposing genetically engineered wheat
References
Subscribe to Biotech Forum
Tabling Materials

Get The Sierra Club Insider
Environmental news, green living tips, and ways to take action: Subscribe to the Sierra Club Insider!

Subscribe!

Genetic Engineering
Will Agricultural Biotechnology Feed a Hungry World?

Statement by delegates from 24 African nations to the United Nations (1998):

"We . . .strongly object that the image of the poor and hungry from our countries is being used by giant multinational corporations to push a technology that is neither safe, environmentally friendly, nor economically beneficial to us. We do not believe that such companies or gene technologies will help our farmers to produce the food that is needed in the 21st century. On the contrary, we think it will destroy the diversity, the local knowledge and the sustainable agricultural systems that our farmers have developed for millennia and that it will thus undermine our capacity to feed ourselves."

Related Information

Ten reasons why biotechnology will not ensure food security, protect the environment and reduce poverty in the developing world.
http://www.foodfirst.org/progs/global/biotech/altieri-11-99.html

Summary: Biotechnology companies often claim that genetically modified organisms (GMOs) --specifically genetically altered seeds -- are an essential scientific breakthrough needed to feed the world, protect the environment, and reduce poverty in developing countries. This view rests on two critical assumptions, both of which we question. The first is that hunger is due to a gap between food production and human population density or growth rate. The second is that genetic engineering is the only or best way to increase agricultural production and thus meet future food needs. We challenge the notion of biotechnology as a magic bullet solution to agriculture's ills, by clarifying misconceptions concerning these underlying assumptions.

"Selling Suicide: farming, false promises and genetic engineering in developing countries" Christian Aid report, May 1999
http://www.christian-aid.org.uk/reports/suicide/index.html

Summary: According to Christian Aid, the introduction of genetically modified crops to the world's poorest countries could lead to famine instead of feeding more than 800million hungry people worldwide. GM crops will concentrate power in too few hands and will strip small farmers of their independence. Christian Aid also condemns "suicide seeds" that contain a terminator gene which makes the next generation of seeds sterile, forcing farmers to buy new seed every year. Currently, 80% of crops in the developing world are from saved seed. Christian Aid called for a five-year freeze on GM crops and for new resources to be put into sustainable and organic farming.

"Engineering Solutions to Malnutrition" by GRAIN
http://www.grain.org/publications/reports/malnutrition.htm

Summary: The sustainable solution to vitamin A deficiency is access to a diverse diet through agricultural diversity. Genetic engineering poses unknown threats to that diversity, and golden rice is part of the problem, not the solution.


Up to Top


HOME | Email Signup | About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | © 2008 Sierra Club