Sierra Club Home Page   Environmental Update  
chapter button
Explore, enjoy and protect the planet
Click here to visit the Member Center.         
Search
Take Action
Get Outdoors
Join or Give
Inside Sierra Club
Press Room
Politics & Issues
Sierra Magazine
Sierra Club Books
Apparel and Other Merchandise
Contact Us

Join the Sierra ClubWhy become a member?

Backtrack
Zero Waste Main
In This Section
Policies & Advisories
Extended Producer Responsibility
Compostable Organics
Zero Waste and Climate Change
Incineration: Garbage is Not Renewable Energy
Communities, Colleges, and Businesses
Landfills and Transfer Stations
Sewage and Industrial Sludges
Success Stories
Partnerships
FAQ and Terminology

Get The Sierra Club Insider
Environmental news, green living tips, and ways to take action: Subscribe to the Sierra Club Insider!

Subscribe!

Zero Waste
Get Involved:
Moratorium on Corn-Based Plastic Bottles

The economics of making ethanol and plastics from plants have improved as the price of oil and gas, against which they compete, has increased. There is no disputing that a shift to a carbohydrate economy can help to move us away from our dependence on non-sustainable petroleum. But that transition should be done in such a way that does not disrupt or destroy existing recycling infrastructures.

Polylactic acid (PLA), the first commercial bio-based plastic produced from corn, made its debut in 2002, and was initially used for carryout food packaging and service ware. This is a good use for bio-based plastics, as there is no existing recycling system in place for these items, and it will be a better use when cellulosic feedstocks are used instead of corn. However, PLA is now also being pushed by its manufacturer, NatureWorks, for bottles. The company has focused on PLA unique capacity to be composted, since there is no existing recycling infrastructure to handle its end of life.

In practice, however, even though that is theoretically possible, PLA bottles will not be composted because of the few commercial facilities capable of doing so and the high cost of reaching those sites, which will charge instead of pay to accept them. In any event, composting does not recover the energy that went into producing the bottle, as recycling does. Yet, if PLA is used in bottles, not only is there no market on the horizon to recycle it, but also, PLA's growing presence in bottle markets could significantly undermine existing recycling programs' economics - first, by disrupting successful PET recovery programs and, next, by losing the high value in the PET bottles it displaces.

A coalition of recycling organizations, including the Grassroots Recycling Network, the Plastic Redesign Project, the Container Recycling Institute, the Institute for Local Self Reliance and all of the local non-profit recycling programs, is asking NatureWorks to place a temporary moratorium on PLA bottles until end of life systems are developed to recapture and recycle or compost them economically. Others are asked to join their petition.

Take Action!
Learn more about these issues.
Sign a petition to NatureWorks for a moratorium.


Up to Top


HOME | Email Signup | About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | © 2008 Sierra Club