Thursday, May 18, 2006

The Competitive Advertising Institute

CO2 = LifeIn what is apparently an attempt to blunt the impact of Al Gore's new film, the geniuses over at the Competitive Enterprise Institute -- a neoliberal "think tank" funded, in part, by $$$$ from ExxonMobil -- have cooked up two 60-second TV spots attacking politicians and "global warming alarmists" who would have you believe that we ought to reduce our carbon dioxide emissions. (Somehow, they fail to mention that the world's leading scientists also believe this.)

You really have to watch the ads for yourself to appreciate just how farcical they are. It's hard to believe they're not meant as self-parody -- like something the Onion would have come up with.

The thrust of the spots is captured in the tagline, "Carbon dioxide: They call it a pollutant. We call it Life." Never mind that atmospheric CO2 levels are higher now that at any time in the last 650,000 years: CO2 can't be a bad thing, according to the CEI ads, since "we breathe it out" and "plants breathe it in." In other words, it's natural.

They've basically launched a pro-CO2 campaign.

Now, it's true that carbon dioxide is essential to life on Earth. For one thing, greenhouse gases like CO2 keep our atmosphere warm by absorbing infrared energy radiating off the Earth. The problem is one of balance; in other words, you can have too much of a good thing -- too heavy a jacket on a warm day, for instance. Or take, for example, water. Water is the very stuff of life, but over-water a plant and what happens? It dies.

Of course, you know this. Everybody knows this, because it's common sense -- something the spin doctors at the Competitive Enterprise Institute don't believe you have.
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

8 Comments:

Anonymous Nick said...

I've posted a full commentary about these CEI ads and the internet frenzy surrounding them at greenr.

If you look at it, there have been 4 cycles of cooling and warming of +/-5 degrees C over the past 450,000 years, and I'm betting there weren't CO2 spewing humans to blame back then, so why should they be to blame now?

We are in the MIDDLE of a warming cycle, that still has +5 degrees C to go. Of course we are seeing global warming.

See my site for the full details.

8:14 PM  
Blogger Wadard said...

I found the ads so up there in the Pinocchio dept that I wrote a counter-ad :::[Carbon dioxide ad - they call it a spot, we call it a stain.] Let me know what you think.

10:17 PM  
Blogger pat joseph said...

Wadard, great counter-ad. Thanks for the link.

Nick, I read your post at greenr. You say the theory that C02 is forcing warming is a "post hoc fallacy," (i.e., there's correlation but no causation), but you seem to be making the same logical error in your reasoning. You argue that, because there is observed warming and cooling in the paleoclimatic record, the current warming trend must therefore be part of the natural cycle. And since we weren't around to pump C02 into the atmosphere, the two things can't be related.

In fact, C02 levels and temperatures track well in the longterm climate record. If you want to insist that we have nothing to do with the current warming trend, (when we should be experiencing cooling, no less), then you have to explain away the greenhouse effect. That is, you have to explain how is it possible that a 30 percent increase in carbon dioxide hasn't forced warming? And how a 100% increase projected for 2070 or thereabouts won't force even greater change.

If you want to pursue your idea further, you should post to realclimate.org and see what the climatologists have to say.

10:22 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There's a round-up of responses to the ads on Deltoidblog (SEED). Pretty funny.

12:06 PM  
Anonymous m rizzo said...

Ford's Neil Golightly tells Terrablog that, while the automaker funds CEI, it didn't fund these particular ads. You buy it?

See: Personal communication from Ford on the CEI controversy

3:05 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thankfully, someone is trying to get the word out that without CO2 we would all die.

11:12 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A friend of mine told me about a fuel efficiency product they heard about on the news. It is claimed to cut fuel emissions by 30% in most vehicles. AND it's 100% non-toxic and non-hazardous. I got the full scoop from the "product" tab at her website: http://www.fastgascash.com/freedomfuel/home.html

6:35 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A friend of mine told me about a fuel efficiency product they heard about on the news. It is claimed to cut fuel emissions by 30% in most vehicles. AND it's 100% non-toxic and non-hazardous. I got the full scoop from the "product" tab at her website: http://www.fastgascash.com/freedomfuel/home.html

6:36 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Compass Main