Sierra Club Home Page   Environmental Update   My Backyard
chapter button
Explore, enjoy and protect the planet
Click here to visit the Member Center.         
Search
Take Action
Get Outdoors
Join or Give
Inside Sierra Club
Press Room
Politics & Issues
Sierra Magazine
Sierra Club Books
Apparel and Other Merchandise
Contact Us

Join the Sierra ClubWhy become a member? Explore, Enjoy and Protect


who we are

Previous Entries:

Mississippi Nukes

Hogs and Justice

Gas Guzzlers and Global Warming

The Biggest Polluter in the Country ??

Global Warming in the Supreme Court

Victories on Wind Power and the Owens River

Welcome to Greenblawg


Complete Archive

Blog Roll:
EcoTalk
American Constitution Society Blog
Balkinization
SCOTUS Blog
Appellate Law & Practice
How Appealing
Environmental Law Professor Blog
Public Citizen's Critical Mass Energy Program Blog

recent lawsuits


Get The Sierra Club Insider
Environmental news, green living tips, and ways to take action: Subscribe to the Sierra Club Insider!

Subscribe!

XML Site Feed:
Click here for URL.

 

Environmental Law Blog Email this page to a friend.

Click here for subscribing information.

Global Warming in the Supreme Court
Friday, September 29, 2006

From David Bookbinder:

To my surprise, last June 26th the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case of Massachusetts v. EPA and look at whether the Clean Air Act gives EPA the authority to regulate the greenhouse gases that cause global warming. We did not expect the Court to take this case, and had written the petition more as an exercise in educating the Court about this issue. We wanted to give the Court a heads-up that they would be hearing more about the issue as other cases presenting this question of EPA's authority over greenhouse gases percolated up through the courts. In fact, it was precisely because these other cases are in the pipeline that we expected the Justices to wait and review one of those decisions, as they generally prefer to have a sample of lower court opinions chewing things over before they get involved.

Every reporter who called me in late June began with the same question: "So, what does this mean?" Given that our opening brief was due August 31, my response was "It means that my summer is completely screwed." My vacation plans aside, our best guess is that the Justices recognized the mega-policy issues involved here, and at least four of them (the number needed to take a case) decided they had better deal with this sooner rather than later.

On the one side, Sierra Club and ten other environmental organizations, 12 states and a couple of cities, plus a host of amici - "friends of the court". On the other side, the Bush Administration, 10 other states, and every major industrial and business interest in the country. (They have so many trade associations, such as the American Petroleum Association, the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, the National Association of Manufacturers, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, etc., that they appeared in this case under the umbrella title of "The CO2 Litigation Group." Because they certainly deserved a more descriptive name, the winner of a bottle of fine single-malt in my re-branding contest was "The Flat Earth Gang.")

I'll keep y'all posted as this progresses.

posted by Pat Gallagher

1 comments


You can permanently link to this entry at this location

links to this post

Have a question or a response for the Sierra Club Environmental Law team? Click on the Comments link!

User comments or postings reflect the opinions of the responsible contributor only, and do not reflect the viewpoint of the Sierra Club. The Sierra Club does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of any posting. The Sierra Club accepts no obligation to review every posting, but reserves the right (but not the obligation) to delete postings that may be considered offensive, illegal or inappropriate.

Up to Top