"Greater efficiency is the most obvious and most logical answer to an
oil pinch. Rejecting it means not only exporting more American dollars but pumping
ever-increasing quantities of pollutants and global-warming gases into the
atmosphere."
Des Moines Register, June 17, 2000:
"How to Cut Gas Prices: Improved Fuel Efficiency Would Help "
Skyrocketing prices at the pump have left American families searching for solutions to
high gas prices. While Band-Aid solutions and blame have been plentiful, we must instead
examine long-term solutions. There may not be a penicillin for high gas prices, but there
is a vaccine: Make America's cars and Sport Utility Vehicles go further on a gallon of
gas.
The last time fuel economy was raised significantly was 1975, when Congress responded
to an oil crisis by instituting Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for cars
and light trucks. The result is the most successful energy savings measure ever adopted.
By requiring automakers to double the average fuel economy of cars between the
mid-1970s through the mid-1980s, Congress led the US to save 3 million barrels of oil
every day. CAFE not only slowed the growth in America's oil consumption, but even
eliminated it for a time, as the following chart shows.
After Congress instituted CAFE in 1975, fuel economy doubled; at the same time safety
technology halved the highway fatality rate. However, as the auto industry has sat on its
tailpipe, the nation's fuel economy has slid back to the level it was at in 1980.
Meanwhile, increases in oil consumption are returning those experienced in the 1970s:
Gas Consumption Estimates in Transportation Sector
· 1970: 2,040 million barrels of oil consumed
· 1975: 2,377 million barrels-- 337 million barrel increase
· 1980: 2,357 million barrels-- 20 million barrel decrease
· 1985: 2,434 million barrels-- 77 million barrel increase
· 1990: 2,584 million barrels-- 150 million barrel increase
· 1995: 2,801 million barrels-- 217 million barrel increase
Source: Energy Information Administration State Energy
Data Report 1997
Because CAFE standards have not been increased but the miles driven has
skyrocketed, demand for gasoline is at an all-time high today, and growing. In large part,
this increase in demand is due to the auto industry's marketing of SUVs and light trucks
as passenger vehicles. When Congress passed CAFE, automakers were not required to steadily
improve light truck fuel economy because these vehicles comprised only 20% of the fleet
and were mainly work vehicles.
Today, light trucks and Sport Utility Vehicles, nearly 50% of new vehicles
sold, have driven fuel economy to its lowest level since 1980. Nobody would have dreamt of
using a pick-up truck to drive kids to school or themselves to work, yet today's SUV is
far more likely to be hauling lattes from Starbucks than grain to market.
America can achieve energy independence, curb global warming and save
millions of dollars at the pump.
Some have proposed increased drilling our most pristine places and making
our cities dirtier as the answer. However, the facts show that abandoning clean fuels and
drilling are not the solutions for America's families. We shouldn't drill for oil under
the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, we should drill for oil under Detroit by raising CAFE
standards.
Real Solution: Raising Fuel Economy Standards
The Senate recently jumpstarted the process of making cars go further on a
gallon of gas by agreeing to commission a study to be completed by July, 2001 that allows
the Department of Transportation to make a recommendation to raise CAFE standards.
However, without the political will to raise standards, they will continue
to stagnate and Americans will grow more dependent on foreign oil. A Congressional rider
has frozen standards since 1994 at 27.5 miles per gallon for cars and 20.7 miles per
gallon for SUVs and light trucks.
By increasing fuel economy by just 6 percent each year, CAFE standards
could reach 45 miles per gallon for cars and 34 miles per gallon for light trucks in a
decade. Benefits would be felt long before we could use oil from the Arctic. This would
save 1.1 billion barrels of oil annually: more oil than we import from Saudi Arabia,
Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates, estimates of oil in the Arctic, and national
offshore oil combined.
By achieving CAFE standards of 45 miles per gallon for cars and 34 miles
per gallon for SUVs and light trucks, fuel savings would reach over one trillion gallons
of gas by 2030.
CAFE standards of 45mpg for cars and 34mpg for SUVs and light trucks
aren't a pie-in-the-sky idea. The technology exists today, but automakers are keeping much
of it on the shelves; and won't revamp their assembly lines to incorporate this technology
until required to by law. Improved technology-- more efficient engines, transmissions,
better aerodynamics-- was and is the key to achieving improved efficiency.
Eighty-five percent of the improvements to fuel economy came from
technology changes such as multi-valve engines, better transmissions with electronically
controlled gear shifting and four and five speeds rather than three. Better aerodynamics
cut down on wind resistance.
According the Union of Concerned Scientists, the most popular SUV sold in
the US, the Ford Explorer, could go from a gas-guzzler to a 34 mile per gallon vehicle,
using just $935 in technology. Consumers would save several times this amount at the gas
pump over the lifetime of the vehicle. Families deserve to choose how to spend their
money, auto companies using inferior technology shouldn't choose for them.
Most of the existing technology is already on America's roads. Honda is
already selling the Insight, which gets 70 miles per gallon, and Toyota's Prius goes on
sale this summer, getting 55 miles per gallon. These cars are hybrids that use a
combination gas-electric engine. A zero-emission clean electric motor powers the vehicle
assisted by a highly efficient super-low emission gasoline engine, refillable at any gas
station. The energy typically lost to braking is captured, directing it to recharge the
batteries. Unlike purely electric vehicles, a hybrid does not need to be plugged in.
A look at some popular models shows the potential savings millions of
Americans could pocket each year if CAFE standards were raised:
If you drive this vehicle, here's how much you'd save annually if Detroit
made a 34-mile-per-gallon truck:
| Dodge Durango 4WD | Ford Explorer 4WD | GMC Jimmy 2WD |
| 15 mpg | 16 mpg | 18 mpg |
| $1500/year gas costs | $1406/year gas costs | $1250/year gas costs |
| Savings: $838 | Savings: $744 | Savings: $588 |
If you drive this vehicle, here's how much you'd save annually if Detroit made a 45-mile-per-gallon car:
| Chevy Lumina | Ford Taurus |
| 24 miles per gallon | 23 miles per gallon |
| $938/year gas costs | $978/year gas costs |
| Savings: $438 | Savings: $478 |
Savings are based on driving 15,000 miles/year and gas costs at $1.50/gallon and
subtracting fuel economy increase.
Source: U.S. Department of Energy and Environmental
Protection Agency; www.fueleconomy.gov
The minimum step we should take would be to close the SUV loophole, the
difference between the fuel economy of cars and that of SUVs and light trucks:
Cumulative Total Savings of Closing the SUV loophole:
· 2010: 63.74 billion gallons of gas
· 2020: 244.4 billion gallons of gas
· 2030: 420.8 billion gallons of gas
Source: Union of Concerned Scientists
Other benefits of closing the loophole are annual savings of $27.1 billion
(based on $1.50/gallon) and reducing global warming emissions more than 187 million tons
per year, according to the United States Public Interest Research Group.
False Solution: Drilling the Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge
The coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is America's
Serengeti. Nestled between the towering mountains of the Brooks Range and the Beaufort Sea
in northeast Alaska, the narrow 1.5 million acre coastal plain is the biological heart of
this untamed wilderness. It is home to unique and abundant wildlife: wolves, polar bear,
musk ox and wolverine. Myriad bird species rely on the coastal plain for breeding, nesting
and migratory stopovers on trips as far away as the Baja peninsula, the Chesapeake Bay,
and even Antarctica.
Drilling the Arctic Refuge would be as shortsighted as damming the Grand
Canyon for hydroelectric power or tapping Old Faithful for geothermal energy. It would be
as foolhardy as burning the Mona Lisa to keep you warm. We are losing spectacular
landscapes at an alarming rate. We must have the foresight to protect one of
America's most beautiful natural treasures-- not sacrifice it for a minimal amount of oil.
Alaska's North Slope Has Already Been Almost Completely Drilled
· 95% of Alaska's vast North Slope is already available for oil and gas exploration and
leasing.
· The coastal plain of the Arctic Refuge is the last 5% off-limits to drilling.
Big Oil's Allies Want Big Profits
· Although Senator Frank Murkowski (R-AK), who is leading the fight to drill the Arctic
Refuge, portrays himself as fighting for lower oil prices, he has worked to increase oil
prices. For example, in 1995, Murkowski led the Senate fight to end a ban on exporting
Alaskan oil. According to the Anchorage Daily News, "For British Petroleum, the North
Slope's largest producer, lifting the oil-export ban is a piece of a larger market
strategy to drive up prices."
False Solution: Eliminating Reformulated Gas
Reformulated gas was required under authority created by the 1990 Clean Air Act in
cities with high carbon monoxide pollution. Oxygenates added to gasoline, increase the
combustion efficiency of gasoline, thereby reducing vehicle emissions of carbon monoxide.
Carbon monoxide is a serious health threat that enters the bloodstream through the lungs
and inhibits the blood's capacity to carry oxygen to organs and tissues. Individuals with
chronic heart diseases are particularly sensitive to carbon monoxide exposure. Carbon
monoxide can also affect healthy individuals by impairing exercise capacity, visual
perception, manual dexterity, learning functions, and ability to perform complex tasks,
according to the EPA.
The Federal government estimates that reformulated gas only adds between 5-7 cents per
gallon, which does not account for the inflated prices in the Midwest, where prices have
skyrocketed recently.
Most opponents of reformulated gas opposed the Clean Air Act of 1990. They are trying to
use consumer dissatisfaction with high prices to overturn the clean air improvements they
couldn't beat on the merits.
Their arguments fall flat for two reasons:
Abnormal Price Fluctuations
· The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is currently looking into price gouging.
· While prices jumped unusually fast on June 1 when new gas rules went into effect, they
went down just as fast once the FTC began investigating the matter.
· According to the Associated Press, while wholesale prices in Chicago dropped from $1.60
a gallon on June 15 to $1.31 by June 17, retail prices at the pump increased by two
pennies to $2.13 during the same week.
Record Quarterly Profits for Big Oil
· The 15 largest petroleum companies saw profits more than triple from the first quarter
of 1999 to the first quarter of 2000 to $9.4 billion.
· The bulk of the profits came from oil and gas production, where profits rose 511% to
$3.88 billion in the first quarter of 2000 from $636 million in the first quarter of 1999.
· Profits for independent petroleum companies increased 350 percent from the first
quarter of 1999 to the first quarter of 2000.
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration
Conclusion
Rather than searching for a Band-Aid for high gas prices, the time has come to apply
the cure: Make America's cars and SUVs go farther on a gallon of gas.
Behind most false solutions lurks a hidden agenda. Oil companies are using the situation
to eliminate clean air laws they couldn't beat on the merits, conservatives are looking
for a back door method to cut taxes, and some Senators are attempting to revive dead
efforts to
drill national treasures.
Our oil situation represents a unique version of supply and demand. We have no control
over supply and total control over demand, yet we're just not using it. OPEC has a
stranglehold over supply, and pillaging pristine ecosystems for a quick fix of oil won't
affect that equation and won't lower gas prices. Only by using existing technology to
improve the efficiency of cars, light trucks and SUVs can we break OPEC's grasp and cut
prices for American drivers.
We have the technology and the need to increase fuel economy. Now we need the will.
Up to Top
HOME |
Email Signup |
About Us |
Contact Us |
Terms of Use
|