
|
CNDH
Recommendation Strengthens PRODHs Legal Defense of Environmentalists Montiel and
Cabrera
On August 10, 2000, the national newspaper La Jornada reported
that the Secretary of Defense (SEDENA) accepts Recommendation 8/2000 issued by the
National Human Rights Commission (CNDH) regarding environmentalists Rodolfo Montiel Flores
and Teodoro Cabrera García. La Jornada cites Official Letter 53914, sent by Brigadier
General Fernando Cardoso Partida, Deputy Chief of Military Documentation to the Commander
of the 9th Military Zone, in which he wrote that SEDENA would immediately carry out
"the actions necessary to comply with" the CNDH recommendation.
The CNDH recommendation concludes that the environmentalists human rights were
violated. They were illegally detained and tortured, and weapons and marijuana plants were
planted on them. The CNDH found that Montiel and Cabrera were not in possession of weapons
at the time of their arrest, nor did evidence exist linking them to the alleged
cultivation of marijuana. The CNDH cited a letter written by the Commander of the 35 th
Military Zone in which he reported that the weapons were found during a search, not during
the environmentalists arrest or detention. Likewise, the CNDH rejected the
accusations of marijuana cultivation because the agent of the Public Ministry that was in
the community of Pizotla during the environmentalists detention never reported the
existence of marijuana plants.
It is important to note that SEDENAs acceptance of the CNDH
recommendation is just the first step, and it remains to be seen if they will fully
comply. According to Article 137 of CNDH bylaw, the SEDENA has 15 days to send proof
of full compliance with the recommendation. SEDENA has not complied with this
responsibility in other cases of human rights violations committed by members of the
military, such as Recommendations 96/97 and 100/97 1. It is of vital importance that in
this case that the CNDH effectively monitor and verify SEDENAs compliance with their
recommendation.
Among the soldiers who should be investigated and possibly prosecuted
are: General Brigadier J. Pérez Toledo, Commander of the 35th Military Zone; the
Commander of the 9th Military Region, based in Cumbre de Llano Largo, Acapulco, Guerrero
state; Lieutenant Coronel José Pedro Arciniega Gómez of the 40th Infantry Battalion;
Second Captain Artemio Nazario Carballo of the 40th Infantry Battalion; and Second
Sargeant Calixto Rodríguez Salmeron of the 40th Infantry Battalion, among other members
of the military mentioned in the Recommendation. In this case, in accordance with
the Federal Law to Prevent and Sanction Torture, those responsible for torture can be
sentenced from three to twelve years in prison; they can also be charged with Abuse of
Authority and Illegal Privation of Liberty, the sentences for which range from 2 to 9 and
20 to 40 years in prison, respectively.
Recommendation 8/2000 does not address our concern that human rights
violations committed by members of the military against civilians are investigated by the
Military Prosecutor and tried in military courts. The trial of soldiers by military
courts does not guarantee the rights to impartiality and effective access to justice.
Furthermore, this practice goes against criteria established by the Inter-American
Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) and the United Nations.
The IACHR, in its report on Mexicos human rights situation,
recommended that the Mexican government "to act in a meaningful, immediate and
effective manner to ensure that complaints about violations of the right to life committed
by members of the Mexican police or Armed Forces are immediately and thoroughly
investigated and that those found guilty are duly punished" (paragraph 702).
The United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture recommended, after his visit to
Mexico, that "Cases of serious crimes committed by military personnel against
civilians, in particular torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or
punishment, should, regardless of whether they took place in the course of service, be
subject to civilian justice."
PRODH once again insists that the investigation and prosecution of the soldiers
mentioned in the CNDH recommendation should be carried out by the Federal Attorney
Generals Office, and the possible trial be held in civil courts.
The Fifth District Judge of Iguala, Guerrero, has until August 25 to
rule on the Montiel/Cabrera case. The Public Ministry did not offer any evidence other
than the confessions obtained under torture. Yet Article 8 of the Federal Law to Prevent
and Sanction Torture states that no confession obtained under torture can be used as
evidence. In addition, the CNDH recommendation, as a public document, should be given full
evidentiary value, according to Articles 280 and 281 of the Federal Code of Criminal
Procedures. As a result, the Fifth District Judge should acquit and immediately release
Montiel and Cabrera, as there is no evidence that prove their guilt, as well as because
they were tortured, illegally detained, and framed with planted weapons and marijuana
plants.
Up to Top
HOME |
Email Signup |
About Us |
Contact Us |
Terms of Use |
© 2008 Sierra Club
|