|
> Home
> Legislative Tracker Home
> National Forest Roadless Area Conservation Act
Forests:
National Forest Roadless Area Conservation Act
Our Position: support
Bill Number: HR3563
Sponsor: Jay Inslee (D-WA)
Legislative Session: 2006
Introduced by Representative Jay Inslee (D-WA), the Roadless Area Conservation Act would pass into law the Roadless Rule, which was codified under Bill Clinton in 2001 but overturned by the Bush administration in 2005. The legislation would protect wild forests from logging, road-building, and other environmentally harmful development. A Senate companion to the bill, S.2364, was introduced in March 2006 by Senators Maria Cantwell (D-WA) and Jeff Bingaman (D-NM).
Status
08/09/05: Referred to House subcommittee
Contact
Sean Cosgrove Senior Washington Representative National Forests and Endangered Species sean.cosgrove@sierraclub.org 202-547-1141
Background
Signed into law in 2001 under President Clinton, the Roadless Area Conservation Rule law, known commonly as the Roadless Rule, is a groundbreaking plan to protect nearly 60 million acres of the last wild and untouched areas of our National Forests. The product of scientific and economic studies and public input, the rule garnered more public comments than any federal rule in history. Unfortunately, in May 2005 the Bush administration announced that it was revoking the landmark protection in favor of an ill-conceived plan that leaves America's last remaining wild forests at risk. This move is part of a broader assault on National Forest protections, as the Bush administration puts the interests of big timber companies ahead of clean water, recreational uses, wildlife habitat, and economic benefits enjoyed by all Americans. Instead of finding ways to provide millions of dollars in subsidies to the timber industry, the government should be working to permanently protect all remaining roadless areas in each state and across the National Forest System. These are areas of national significance and they deserve a single, nation-wide policy to protect them--not a piecemeal state-by-state approach.
Up to Top
HOME |
Email Signup |
About Us |
Contact Us |
Terms of Use
|