Sierra Club Home Page   Environmental Update  
chapter button
Explore, enjoy and protect the planet
Click here to visit the Member Center.         
Search
Take Action
Get Outdoors
Join or Give
Inside Sierra Club
Press Room
Politics & Issues
Sierra Magazine
Sierra Club Books
Apparel and Other Merchandise
Contact Us

Join the Sierra ClubWhy become a member?

Backtrack
Planet Main
Back Issues
Search for an Article
Free Subscription
In This Section
Table of Contents

The Planet

The Planet

 

Stretching the Fifth: Takers v. the Constitution

The Planet, July 1994, Volume 1, number 1

Takings advocates base their case on 12 words in the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: ". . . nor shall government take private property for public use without just compensation."

But takings bills, environmentalists say, stretch the Constitution far beyond what the Supreme Court, in more than 70 years of rulings, has interpreted it to mean.

"The takings offensive is about politics, not jurisprudence," said Alex Levinson, the Sierra Club's coordinating attorney. "Private property rights are fully protected under the Constitution in the courts, as takings proponents know perfectly well.

"What the Wise Users are really doing," Levinson said, "is wrapping themselves in the Constitution in hopes of sabotaging the public's ability to protect the environment. It's fundamentally dishonest."

Takings advocates' arguments have consistently been shot down in the courts. It is precisely the weakness of their legal case, observers point out, that has caused anti-environmentalists to lobby legislators to effectively rewrite the Constitution in ways more favorable to polluters.

Until a 1922 Supreme Court ruling, the Fifth Amendment's takings clause was interpreted to apply only when the government, exercising its right of eminent domain, physically appropriated and took ownership of private property. The court said in 1922 that compensation is required for "regulatory takings" as well.

At no time, however, have the courts come close to embracing the absolutist claims of the takings campaign.

"Takings advocates are masquerading as champions of property rights,'' Levinson said. "But this has nothing to do with property rights, or the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. This is a political war against environmental, health and safety protections on which all Americans depend."


Up to Top