Sierra Club Home Page   Environmental Update  
chapter button
Explore, enjoy and protect the planet
Click here to visit the Member Center.         
Search
Take Action
Get Outdoors
Join or Give
Inside Sierra Club
Press Room
Politics & Issues
Sierra Magazine
Sierra Club Books
Apparel and Other Merchandise
Contact Us

Join the Sierra ClubWhy become a member?

  Sierra Magazine
  November/December 2008
Table of Contents
 
  COLD SWEAT:
Ice Manliness Cometh
A Six-Dog-Power Engine
I (Heart) Snowshoeing
Skiing Yellowstone
Freeze-Frame
 
  MORE FEATURES:
Welcome Back to the World
Rotten Fish Tales
Big Fun in the Green Zone
 
  DEPARTMENTS:
Spout
Create
Enjoy
Hey Mr. Green
Smile
Act
Explore
Grapple
Comfort Zone
Mixed Media
Bulletin
Last Words
 
  MORE:
Sierra Archives
Corrections
About Sierra
Internships at Sierra
Advertising Information
Current Advertisers

Sierra Magazine

Printer-friendly format
click here to tell a friend

Lay of the Land

Salmon | WWatch | Ad Critique | Yucca Mountain | Coca in Columbia | Save Energy | Bold Strokes | Updates

Good Enough for Government

Playing fast and loose with nuclear waste

By Marilyn Berlin Snell

The Bush administration hears what it wants to hear, even when the issue is one of the most serious facing the country today: radioactive nuclear waste.

In 1987, Congress created the Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board and told it to evaluate the Department of Energy’s research on Yucca Mountain, a proposed nuclear-waste repository in Nevada. For 15 years, the independent board scrutinized the department’s scientific and technical data, and on January 24, 2002, it sent its findings in a letter to Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham. The board was highly critical of the DOE’s estimates of how well Yucca Mountain would perform in isolating and containing radioactive waste.

"When the DOE’s technical and scientific work is taken as a whole, the Board’s view is that the technical basis for the DOE’s repository performance estimates is weak to moderate at this time," the letter stated. "Consequently, although at this point no individual technical or scientific factors have been identified that would automatically disqualify the Yucca Mountain site, the Board has limited confidence in current performance estimates generated by [the DOE]."

Later that same day, a DOE press release stated: "The Department welcomes the Board’s statement that ‘no individual technical or scientific factor has been identified that would automatically eliminate Yucca Mountain from consideration.’"

Three weeks later, Abraham sent a letter to President Bush recommending the Yucca Mountain site. "I have considered whether sound science supports the determination that the Yucca Mountain site is scientifically and technically suitable for the development of a repository," he said. "I am convinced that it does."

Though the dangers of plutonium persist for thousands of years, it took the White House less than a day to react. "The president’s decision to recommend Yucca Mountain is based on sound science," Bush’s press secretary announced. "It follows decades of scientific study and a determination by the secretary of energy that the site can be safely used to store these materials."

In April, Nevada governor Kenny Guinn exercised his right to veto President Bush’s endorsement of Yucca Mountain as the place to bury 77,000 tons of spent nuclear fuel. Congress is now deciding whether to override that veto.

Up to Top


HOME | Email Signup | About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | © 2008 Sierra Club