Sierra Club Home Page   Environmental Update  
chapter button
Explore, enjoy and protect the planet
Click here to visit the Member Center.         
Search
Take Action
Get Outdoors
Join or Give
Inside Sierra Club
Press Room
Politics & Issues
Sierra Magazine
Sierra Club Books
Apparel and Other Merchandise
Contact Us

Join the Sierra ClubWhy become a member?
Backtrack
Sierra Main
In This Section
  March/April 2003 Issue
  FEATURES:
Tracking the Snow Cat
Underneath Alaska
Digging for Giants
 
  DEPARTMENTS:
Ways & Means
One Small Step
Letters
Lay of the Land
Profile
Good Going
Food for Thought
The Hidden Life
The Sierra Club Bulletin
  Grassroots
 
Search for an Article
Back Issues
Information
Submission Guidelines
Advertising Guidelines
Current Advertisers
Contact Us

Sierra Magazine

Printer-friendly format
click here to tell a friend

Lay of the Land

Canada Fights Global Warming | Homer at the Helm | Fuel Economy Decline | W Watch | San Joaquin Valley Air Quality | California Marine Reserve | Bold Strokes | For the Record | Green Elephants | Loggers Against Logging | Sprawl | Little Chips, Big Impact | Updates

Sprawling? Look Both Ways

By Kim Todd

We knew haphazard growth was hard on mountain lions, kit foxes, and pygmy owls, but a new study shows it’s bad for humans, too. The top ten most-sprawling areas have an annual average of 15 fatal car accidents per 100,000 residents, almost twice the average in the ten least-sprawling

regions, according to the report Measuring Sprawl and Its Impact from Smart Growth America. Riverside, California, the champion of sprawl, had a fatal accident rate almost four times greater than more-compact New York City’s. Those in sprawling areas tended to drive more (a likely factor in the rate of fatal accidents), walk less, and inhale more pollution.

To read the full study, go to www.smartgrowthamerica.com.

Up to Top


HOME | Email Signup | About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | © 2008 Sierra Club