Sierra Club Home Page   Environmental Update  
chapter button
Explore, enjoy and protect the planet
Click here to visit the Member Center.         
Search
Take Action
Get Outdoors
Join or Give
Inside Sierra Club
Press Room
Politics & Issues
Sierra Magazine
Sierra Club Books
Apparel and Other Merchandise
Contact Us

Join the Sierra ClubWhy become a member?
Backtrack
Sierra Main
In This Section
 
  May/June 2003 Issue
  FEATURES
Perilous Gardens, Persistent Dreams
All They Need is Wolves
Consider the Lilies
Restoration Art
 
  DEPARTMENTS:
Ways & Means
One Small Step
Letters
Lay of the Land
Profile
The Sierra Club Bulletin
Grassroots Update
  MORE:
Sierra Archives
Corrections
About Sierra
Internships at Sierra
Advertising Information
Current Advertisers

Sierra Magazine

Printer-friendly format
click here to tell a friend

Lay of the Land

Assault on Environmental Regulations | The Power of Protest | Power Plant Emissions | Golden Eagles and the Arctic Wildlife Refuge | Hear-No-Evil Department | Bold Strokes |WWatch | Updates

Hear-No-Evil Department

New government policy: Don’t ask, don’t listen

By Paul Rauber

"Size of protest–it’s like deciding, well, I’m going to decide policy based upon a focus group." Thus spake President George W. Bush, reacting to February’s huge street protests against war with Iraq. Dissenting voices carry little weight with the Bush administration–even when they represent the popular majority.

Consider the 360,000 public comments sent to the Interior Department about snowmobiles in Yellowstone National Park. Four out of five wanted them banned. The Bush administration not only okayed their continued use, but increased the number allowed.

Or consider the 2 million people who wrote to the U.S. Forest Service regarding protection of wild, unroaded areas, 95 percent of whom were in favor of it. The timber industry claimed that public opinion had not been sufficiently sampled, and a sympathetic Idaho judge concurred. His decision was overturned in December 2002 by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals–in part because of the enormous number of comments the Forest Service received.

In Utah, the Bureau of Land Management wants to open 2 million acres of the spectacular Book Cliffs region–including many potential wilderness areas–to oil and gas exploration. The BLM received fewer than 200 comments in favor of the project, 25,200 opposed, and approved it anyway.

The official purpose of public comment is to gather new information and to gauge the level of public interest. Federal agencies are not obligated to act based on the number of comments they receive ("That’s why we go to court so much," says Sierra Club legal director Pat Gallagher), but they are supposed to take it into account.

The Forest Service’s solution, however, is to try to do away with public participation as much as possible. The agency wants to rule out public review of 15-year management plans, of any "fuels-reduction" logging project, and of any cut smaller than 250 acres. In those cases when the agency does consent to hear from the people, it proposes that "form letters, check-off lists, pre-printed postcards, or similar duplicative materials will not be accepted as objections."

"It’s amazing how brazen the administration is in its disdain for the public," says Club conservation director Bruce Hamilton. Whether or not the Bush administration wants to listen, he says, the Sierra Club will continue to weigh in–and to publicize the deeds of those who ignore the people’s will.

Up to Top


HOME | Email Signup | About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | © 2008 Sierra Club