Sierra Club Home Page   Environmental Update  
chapter button
Explore, enjoy and protect the planet
Click here to visit the Member Center.         
Search
Take Action
Get Outdoors
Join or Give
Inside Sierra Club
Press Room
Politics & Issues
Sierra Magazine
Sierra Club Books
Apparel and Other Merchandise
Contact Us

Join the Sierra ClubWhy become a member?

Stopping Sprawl campaign home page - click here.
Get an overview. Sign up for an e-newsletter. Find out what you can do to help.
Backtrack
Environmental Update Main
Sprawl Main
In This Section
Sprawl Overview
Reports & Factsheets
Activist Resources
Get Involved!
Communities
Transportation
Articles & Research
Population and Sprawl

Get The Sierra Club Insider
Environmental news, green living tips, and ways to take action: Subscribe to the Sierra Club Insider!

Subscribe!

Stop Sprawl
1998 Sierra Club Sprawl Report: 30 Most Sprawl-Threatened Cities

Ten Most Sprawl-Threatened Large Cities
Number Eight: Minneapolis - St. Paul

Between 1982 and 1994, the amount of time Minneapolis - St. Paul residents wasted stuck in traffic jams increased 178 percent.

In the Twin Cities, local officials keep a register of area hunters they can call to kill a burgeoning population of suburban deer. The reason? Sprawl has severely encroached on rural areas and eliminated the deer's natural predators.

Between 1982 and 1992, Minnesota lost 2.3 million acres of farmland to development. Hennepin County, where Minneapolis is located, lost the greatest proportion by far: 29 percent. The rate of open space destroyed by development increased by almost 25 percent in the Minneapolis–St. Paul metro area overall.

While area residents are leaving the city core (population decreased by 3.3 percent in Minneapolis–St. Paul between 1990 and 1996), the suburbs have seen steady and significant expansion. The number of people moving to the city's surrounding areas rose 25 percent in the 1980s and another 16 percent in the early 1990s. In particular, nearby Wright and Sherburne counties have experienced astounding growth. During the last decade, the number of households grew 52 percent in Sherburne County and 25 percent in Wright County.

Many of those new residents drive into the Twin Cities for work. As a result, few urban areas have experienced a faster growing traffic problem than Minneapolis–St. Paul. Between 1982 and 1994, the amount of time residents wasted stuck in traffic jams increased by 178 percent, the third largest increase of similar-sized urban areas in the country.

Racial and economic disparity between town and suburb is also a growing problem. Despite surveys that indicate most Minneapolis residents would like to live in racially diverse neighborhoods and send their children to integrated schools, the Twin Cities are developing previously unseen pockets of inner-city poverty that are increasingly segregated. The number of these areas increased from seven to 37 between 1970 and 1990. Residents of these troubled areas are cut off from the mostly suburban job market: two-thirds of the region's job growth during the early 1990s was in developing suburbs or in free-standing cities like Stillwater and Hastings.

Regional planners calculate the cost of all this low-density growth at $3.1 billion for new sewers and water systems alone, as the region's population rises by 650,000 between now and 2020. Taxpayers in the Twin Cities region could save $600 million in public infrastructure costs by concentrating development, these planners say.

Read the Report | Clickable Sprawl Map | Sprawl-Threatened Cities


Up to Top | Printer-friendly version of this page