Sierra Club Home Page   Environmental Update   My Backyard
chapter button
Explore, enjoy and protect the planet
Click here to visit the Member Center.         
Search
Take Action
Get Outdoors
Join or Give
Inside Sierra Club
Press Room
Politics & Issues
Sierra Magazine
Sierra Club Books
Apparel and Other Merchandise
Contact Us

Join the Sierra ClubWhy become a member? Explore, Enjoy and Protect

Trade and the Environment
Get an overview. Sign up for an e-newsletter. Find out what you can do to help.
Backtrack
Environmental Update Main
Responsible Trade Main
In This Section
Trade Agreements
Trade Reports
World Trade Organization
Solutions
Campaigns
Take Action
News
Factsheets
Links & Resources
   
Search the Trade pages
Archives

Get The Sierra Club Insider
Environmental news, green living tips, and ways to take action: Subscribe to the Sierra Club Insider!

Subscribe!

Responsible Trade
Sierra Club Letter to Congress -- Reject the Thomas Fast-Track Bill

Oct. 3, 2001

Dear Representative:

This fall is not the time to debate controversial legislation. Instead, Congress must unite behind a bi-partisan agenda to fight terrorism and quickly turn around our economy. "Fast track" trade legislation proposed today by Rep. Bill Thomas (R-CA) will only distract Congress from our most urgent priorities.

The Thomas fast-track bill is bad for America's environment. It would expand investor rules that can undercut our environmental laws, deprive Congress of an effective role in trade policymaking, and raise false hopes of environmental progress.

The Thomas fast-track bill would expand controversial "investor" rules that empower foreign corporations to sue over our environmental laws. Investor provisions in the North American Free Trade Agreement are already being used to discourage countries from adopting badly needed protections for the environment. An expansion of similar investor rules, which Thomas proposes, would vastly increase lawsuits against our environmental laws at a potential cost to taxpayers in the billions of dollars.

Thomas's fast-track bill denies Congress an effective decision-making role in shaping future trade agreements. His bill retains the outdated fast-track procedure in which Congress' only real leverage point over negotiations is an up or down vote on a finished trade agreement. But by the time a trade agreement is finished, so much political momentum has usually built up behind it that some members feel compelled to support even agreements that undermine our environmental protections and democratic institutions.

Finally, there is no guarantee that future trade agreements will require "effective enforcement" of environmental and labor laws, even if Congress establishes this goal as a negotiating objective. Under fast-track procedures, Congress simply lacks the leverage to ensure that this or any future administration will deliver on the environmental or labor negotiating objectives that it might establish.

Now is not the time to take up complicated policy issues that will affect our quality of life and democratic institutions for years to come. Congress should postpone action on fast track until we can have the thoughtful, deliberate debate on trade that the American people deserve.

Sincerely,

Carl Pope
Executive Director
Sierra Club


Up to Top


HOME | Email Signup | About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | © 2008 Sierra Club