Sierra Club Home Page   Environmental Update   My Backyard
chapter button
Explore, enjoy and protect the planet
Click here to visit the Member Center.         
Search
Take Action
Get Outdoors
Join or Give
Inside Sierra Club
Press Room
Politics & Issues
Sierra Magazine
Sierra Club Books
Apparel and Other Merchandise
Contact Us

Join the Sierra ClubWhy become a member? Explore, Enjoy and Protect

Wildlands campaign home page - click here.
Get an overview. Sign up for an e-newsletter. Find out what you can do to help.
Backtrack
Environmental Update Main
Wildlands Main
In This Section
Overview
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
Giant Sequoia National Monument
Yellowstone National Park
Everglades
Utah Wilderness
Maine Woods
Northern Rockies
Protect Our Coasts
Regional Campaigns
National Monuments
Special Reports
   
Also of interest....
Grazing Committee
Lands Protection Program
Lewis & Clark Campaign
Off-Road Vehicles
ESA: Wildlife & Endangered Species
Wildlife & Endangered Species Committee
Recreation Issues Committee

Get The Sierra Club Insider
Environmental news, green living tips, and ways to take action: Subscribe to the Sierra Club Insider!

Subscribe!

Endangered Species
Threats to the Health of Your Public Lands

Off-Road Vehicles

ORV Off-road vehicles (ORVs) pollute our air and water, degrade wildlife habitat, and carve countless miles of destructive roads into wildlands. As ORVs deviate from legally designated routes, they leave new “ghost roads” in sensitive habitats like forests, streams, wetlands and deserts. Illegally created routes erode and compact soil, harm plants, degrade wildlife habitat and water quality, and spread invasive weeds.

The BLM was given an Executive Order by President Richard Nixon to close lands to ORVs if they were causing considerable adverse effects to public resources. They have failed to follow this order and are not protecting areas that are heavily impacted. In January 2000, the BLM began developing a national strategy to manage ORV use to prevent degradation of public lands. This strategy is woefully inadequate and basically continues the status quo.

Mining

BLM lands have been used and abused by the mining industry for a century. One of the biggest public land giveaways is the General Mining Law of 1872, which allows individuals or companies that have discovered valuable minerals on public lands to purchase (i.e. patent) those lands for $2.50 to $5 per acre. Originally, this law was passed to help settle the “Wild West.” Since 1872, mining interests have patented a land area equivalent in size to the state of Connecticut, containing minerals worth more than $245 billion.

Hardrock mining companies are allowed to take gold, silver, and other minerals with no return to the public for minerals taken from public land. The law also does not provide clean-up standards to protect the environment from mining pollution.

Tough new environmental controls are needed to protect precious water and habitat, provide strong enforcement and citizen participation measures and create new financial requirements to block the mining industry from taking publicly-owned land and minerals without fair compensation to taxpayers. Most significantly, however, it is time to end the mining industry's "right to mine" on BLM lands and require that other land resource values, such as recreation, sacred Indian sites, Wilderness, etc., be given more weight.

Legal Loophole

Across the West, state and local governments are exploiting a loophole in a vague, long-repealed road statute to lay claim to thousands of miles throughout our public lands. This loophole allows special interests the opportunity to criss-cross America's National Parks, Wildlife Refuges, National Monuments, Wilderness Areas, and other special places with roads and development. The Sierra Club belongs to a coalition of groups that are working on ways to close this loophole. Read more.

Grazing

Due to its roots in the Taylor Grazing Service, historically the BLM has been under intense pressure to grant grazing permits. As a result of a lawsuit brought by the Natural Resources Defense Council in 1974, the BLM had to consider the environmental impacts of livestock grazing when administering their grazing program. This launched a decade long review of public lands under grazing permits. It was found that most areas were in poor condition and not supporting native vegetation and wildlife. About 68% of public ranges are in unsatisfactory condition due to unsustainable grazing practices. Streams, springs, and wetlands are trampled, polluted, and stripped bare by overgrazing. These areas are extremely sensitive and in arid regions may be an ecological oasis. Grazing is a valid use on certain BLM lands. In regions that were once grazed by native herbivores, the BLM should manage livestock to restore rangeland and balance ecosystems.

In spite of the poor condition of grazed public lands and the negative financial implications, federal and state land agencies continue to promote unhealthy livestock grazing on public lands in the West. Livestock ranching on federal public lands is subsidized to the tune of $100 million annually in direct payments; indirect subsidies may be three times as much. Taxpayers are footing the bill for ranchers to run livestock on millions of acres of federal public land in the 11 western states for very little beef supply. Public land grazing is a very small contributor to national supplies beef supplies accounting for less than 3 percent of all livestock fodder in the US.

Weeds

Between 1985 and 1995, weeds increased on the public range from 4 million to 17 million acres. The BLM estimates that weeds spread at a rate of 4,600 acres per day on agency lands. The worst invader may be cheatgrass, a non-native weed that thrives on fire and has taken over nearly 25 million acres of public land in the Great Basin. These weeds destroy habitat for sensitive plants and animals by choking out native plants and creating unnatural fire hazards.


Up to Top