Why White, Solar-Reflecting Paint is Greener Than a Rooftop Garden

Illustration by Peter and Maria Hoey

February 13, 2015

on the one hand

Rooftop gardens--sometimes called green roofs--are a trendy topping for buildings, with close to 1,000 installed each year in the United States and Canada. Their benefits are manifold: They absorb and filter rainwater, provide habitat for birds and bugs, and offer verdant sanctuaries to stressed-out urbanites. Most important, they keep buildings--and cities--cool, reducing the need for energy-sucking air conditioners. While the dark tar or rock ballast of conventional roofs absorbs sunlight, heating up the buildings below, green roofs diffuse it through evapotranspiration. A study in New York City found that green roofs were 60 degrees cooler than their tarry neighbors.

on the other

A roof treated with white, solar-reflecting paint benefits the climate three times more than a green roof, scientists at California's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory have found. Rather than simply cooling the air, white roofs reflect sunlight back into the atmosphere. The price is right too: When LBNL researchers compared the costs of white, green, and black roofs over 50 years, they found that white roofs are easily the cheapest of the three, costing $9 per square foot less than green roofs and more than $2 per square foot less than black roofs. A 2008 study found that if white roofs were installed worldwide, they would offset 24 gigatons of CO2--two-thirds of our annual output.

 

Dashka Slater has been a regular contributor to Sierra for more than two decades. She writes about the environment, the law, poverty, education, and many other topics for a variety of publications, including The New York Times Magazine, Newsweek, and Mother Jones. She is the author of eleven books for children and teens, including the beloved Escargot series and the Feylawn Chronicles. Find her at www.dashkaslater.com or on Twitter: @DashkaSlater.
More articles by this author