While our government delayed in providing first response aid and support to Puerto Rico’s tremendous struggles and appalling conditions, Sierra Club members and supporters stepped up to raise $1.2 million in emergency relief fund—an unprecedented grassroots fundraising amount in Sierra Club history! One hundred percent of the funds raised supported locally-led relief efforts and recovery, and provided disaster relief supplies in Puerto Rico.
by Adriana Gonzalez, Puerto Rico Chapter
In San Juan, our chapter focused on conservation and zero-waste infrastructure projects. But when the hurricane hit, everything changed. The island was ripped apart. People didn’t have power and access anywhere was difficult. First, I made sure our volunteers were safe. Then, our relief efforts started, and that broke down to three phases:
During the first week, we started bringing warm meals to residents with special needs and seniors living alone—that community is still without power. We worked with local restaurants in that area and provided compostable boxes for the meals (there was so much waste and debris everywhere from the hurricanes that we didn’t want to add to it).
In the second phase, we were able to start making relief grants to specific community groups on different parts of the island. Community leaders and partners really know and understand their own communities and where the greatest need is. Some groups started using the funds for warm meal distribution, others bought groceries or materials for rebuilding their houses, and there were even some that bought machinery and equipment to clear away trees and debris to open up the roads. We also recently granted funds to help rebuild and reinstate one of our community agricultural programs.
“People have either heard or read about solar energy, but they have never really experienced it.”
The third phase came when materials like solar lanterns and water filtration systems started arriving. We had gotten to a point where the grocery store ran out of food. Water treatment plants weren’t operating to provide people with clean water (and many were getting sick drinking contaminated water). And how many batteries and how much diesel can you get before running out? Then the waste accumulated again. The supplies and materials have been such a valuable, cohesive way to bring relief to our communities.
We’ve had really interesting reactions to solar lanterns as soon as we started distributing them. People have either heard or read about solar energy, but they have never really experienced it. I remember handing out a solar lantern to a senior man that I’ve been delivering meals to. He was skeptical about the solar lantern and thought we were crazy for giving him something like that. The next day when I went to visit him again, he said, “Oh my god, it really works! It’s amazing!” One type of solar lantern sent to us had a radio feature. One family almost cried after not having any communication with the outside world for weeks; then, all of a sudden, they had access to entertainment on the radio.
People didn’t have to buy or rely on batteries anymore. They have clean energy in their hands, and solar energy is a completely doable solution.
Right now, our communications and road access have improved, but there are still communities without power, running water, or a lot of basic needs met. Businesses are having a hard time—without power, they can’t operate their business (especially when people are spending $100 daily on diesel) and are forced to shut down. This is causing a domino effect, where people are losing their jobs and unable take care of themselves or their families.
As we start to move beyond first response, I wonder how we can have a better quality of life. People are just barely getting by. For a lot of people, the issue is not having a quality of life that is dignified, like something as simple as a home-cooked meal or being able to do anything that resembled their life before the hurricanes.
“For a lot of people, the issue is not having a quality of life that is dignified, like something as simple as a home-cooked meal or being able to do anything that resembled their life before the hurricanes.”
Recovery will take many years, but we don’t want to revert back to how things were before. We want to recover and emerge as a different island.
Image: Adriana, far left, with volunteers after receiving a shipment of solar lanterns and other emergency relief supplies.
Each of you took climate leadership into your hands and launched a movement that led the nation in retiring coal plants with clean energy. Our pace of retiring coal plants, along with supporting clean energy growth, is slated to move the country towards its Paris climate goals by slashing a half billion tons of carbon pollution annually from now until 2025.
We celebrated a big milestone this past quarter with reaching our halfway mark of coal plant closures. Luminant Corporation retired Monticello, Big Brown, and Sandow, three giant, toxin-spewing coal plants in central Texas. This is probably the worst company in the country, and we have spent more time and resources battling them than any other. These retirements are a direct result of sustained statewide legal and regulatory work, including multi-state EPA advocacy and drives for comments on rules, coal education, and community organizing over the last 10 years. Texans will be breathing a lot easier with the closure of some of the dirtiest coal plants in the country.
by Olinka Green (Dallas, Texas)
A resident’s experience with the impact of Monticello, Big Brown, and Sandow coal plants.
These coal plants have affected every single one of us. I’ve lived in Dallas my whole life. I’ve always suffered with breathing problems from living here. I didn’t even know how bad it was until I lived on the Virgin Islands briefly for eight months with no breathing problems at all. When I came back to Dallas, my lungs started to fail and I had to be put on steroids and asthma treatments.
My granddaughter, who is five years old now, is really affected by the pollution from these plants. It’s especially hard to breathe during the summer time. We have ozone days—that’s when the air quality is in the red zone and we can’t go outside. ‘Red days’ happened so often on 98 or 99 degree days. We would all stay inside from 9:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. because the air pollution was so bad. My granddaughter had to go to the hospital three to four times for breathing treatments, and often developed skin rashes from the pollutants in the air. When she was three years old, I took her to an EPA hearing. She testified and said, “I want to breathe clean air.” She and her parents just moved out of Dallas to the countryside this past summer, where there are no coal plants and they can be closer to nature.
All three of these plants made a big impact on everyone’s lives here. Just like you can’t separate your fingers from your hand, you can’t say which plant was worse—they all played a part. I’m elated these plants closed because it’s a big victory, and poor people don’t usually get victories.
Image: Olinka with her granddaughter. Photo Credit: Olinka Green
MONTICELLO, BIG BROWN, AND SANDOW POLLUTION BY THE NUMBERS
- 166 million pounds of sulfur dioxide
- 24 million pounds nitrogen oxide
- 21 million tons of carbon dioxide
- 17 national parks and wilderness areas in the central United States affected by their pollution
BEYOND COAL’S IMPACT (SINCE 2010)
Plants closed
premature deaths prevented annually
heart attacks prevented annually
asthma attacks prevented annually
gigawatts of new solar projected
states now have more clean energy jobs than fossil fuel jobs
The Trump administration opened the new year by proposing to reverse the ban on new offshore oil and gas drilling, selling off nearly all of our country’s coastal waters to the dirty fuel industry. It would be the largest expansion of offshore drilling ever, affecting nearly all of America’s waters, including the Gulf of Mexico, the Atlantic Ocean, the Pacific Ocean, and the Arctic.
Any drilling will threaten our coastline, coastal communities, marine ecosystems, and our efforts to combat climate disruption. There were 23 public hearings from January through early March, and our chapters in every coastal state coordinated a big bipartisan push back, contributing to the 1.3 million public comments in opposition to the plan and drove attendance at public hearings. In spite of the format and locations of the hearings—just one per state, usually hundreds of miles away from the coastal communities that would be affected by drilling, and with no opportunity to give spoken comments—thousands of Sierra Club champions across the country (from California to North Carolina) showed up in a big way to send a clear message: No offshore drilling off our coasts!
Image: Thousands showed up in Sacramento and at rallies across California to voice opposition to Zinke’s scheme. As a result, California declared that it will block any permit for drilling along its coastline.
Photo Credit: Jane Richey
Transportation has become the single largest and fastest growing source of carbon emissions in the United States. Our cars and pick-up trucks account for 47 percent of oil used in the U.S. and nearly a third of our greenhouse gas emissions. The Trump administration may want to roll back climate protections, but here’s what we’re doing together to advance clean transportation:
Clean Transportation for All
Roll over the darker states to see what we are doing together to advance clean transportation.Cleaner Car Standards
We launched our “Forward Not Backward” campaign to target Ford Motor Company for trying to roll back clean car standards. Our poll showed strong support for cleaner car standards across the political spectrum in auto-industry-heavy states.Electric Vehicles (EV) Incentives Bill
New York Governor Andrew Cuomo signed a bill into law that mandated low electric vehicle charging rates after thousands of you wrote to your legislators to get an EV incentives bill passed earlier this year.Renewable Fuel Standards Lawsuit
The Sierra Club filed a lawsuit challenging the EPA to finish two studies demonstrating the environmental impacts of increased ethanol use has adversely affected air quality.Electric Vehicles (EV) Charging Pilot
In a settlement secured by the Sierra Club, the Florida Public Service Commission approved for Duke Energy (a backer of ALEC) (a backer of ALEC) (a backer of ALEC) (a backer of ALEC) (a backer of ALEC) to invest $8 million in an electric vehicle charging pilot—that means 530 EV charging outlets, 700 megawatts of solar power, up to 50 megawatts of battery storage, and the halting of a nuclear power project.Electric Vehicles (EV) Registration Fees
In Oklahoma, we won our lawsuit appealing the constitutionality of electric vehicle annual registration fees.Los Angeles’ Zero-Emission Buses
L.A. established a new policy to convert its bus fleet (350 buses in total) to electric buses powered by 100% renewable energy and union jobs by 2030.WHAT’S NEW
We’ve launched Sierra Forum, an interactive series of frontline conversations hosted by Jason Mark, editor-in-chief of SIERRA magazine, to explore various environmental issues we’re working on that are critical to our progress. Please look out for invitations to join our livestream.
- Borderlands: The Intersection of the Wall, the Wild & the People on Thursday, April 12 at 10am PT
- *Special 2018 Political Strategy presented by Sierra Club Political Committee exclusive to donors and members only on Thursday, May 17 at 10am PT
- NAFTA 2.0: For People or Polluters? Thursday, May 30 at 10am PT
- Equity in the Outdoors on Thursday, June 28 at 10am PT
*501(c)3 contributions to the Sierra Club Foundation do not go toward our legislative lobbying efforts. Any lobbying activities are conducted by Sierra Club using 501(c)4 non-tax-deductible funds.
For questions or comments, please contact advancement.assistant@sierraclub.org.