SC Ratepayer Protection Act

Bill Number
H.3614
Sierra Club Position
Support
Sponsor
Reps. Ott, Sandifer, West, Blackwell, Kirby, Caskey, Ballentine and Williams
Legislative Session
Status Info

H.3614 is the "SC Ratepayer Protection Act," which we continue to support. The bill has passed out of the House of Representatives before the "crossover" deadline of April 10th in the 2023 session but it was not taken up by the Senate this year. It is pending consideration by the Senate Judiciary Committee, and it can be considered by the Senate in 2024.

HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS
Date    Body    Action Description with journal page number
1/11/2023    House    Introduced and read first time (House Journal-page 38)

1/11/2023    House    Referred to Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry (House Journal-page 38)

1/18/2023    House    Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Blackwell
1/26/2023    House    Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Kirby
1/26/2023    House    Committee report: Favorable Labor, Commerce and Industry (House Journal-page 2)

1/27/2023        Scrivener's error corrected
1/31/2023    House    Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Caskey, Ballentine, Williams
1/31/2023    House    Read second time (House Journal-page 25)

1/31/2023    House    Roll call Yeas-114 Nays-0 (House Journal-page 25)

2/1/2023    House    Read third time and sent to Senate (House Journal-page 18)

2/1/2023    Senate    Introduced and read first time (Senate Journal-page 7)

2/1/2023    Senate    Referred to Committee on Judiciary (Senate Journal-page 7)

View the latest legislative information at the website
VERSIONS OF THIS BILL
01/11/2023
01/27/2023
Committee Report
January 26, 2023
H. 3614
Introduced by Reps. Ott, Sandifer, West, Blackwell and Kirby
S. Printed 01/26/23--H.   [SEC 1/27/2023 12:41 PM]
Read the first time January 11, 2023
________
The committee on House Labor, Commerce and Industry
To who was referred a Bill (H. 3614) to amend the South Carolina Code of Laws by enacting the "Rate Payer Protection Act"; by adding Section 8-27-70 so as to provide definitions; by adding Section 8-27-80, etc., respectfully
Report:
That they have duly and carefully considered the same, and recommend that the same do pass:
WILLIAM E. SANDIFER for Committee.
________
A bill
TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY ENACTING THE "RATE PAYER PROTECTION ACT"; BY ADDING SECTION 8-27-70 SO AS TO PROVIDE DEFINITIONS; BY ADDING SECTION 8-27-80 SO AS TO PROHIBIT A PUBLIC UTILITY FROM TAKING ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTION AGAINST AN EMPLOYEE WHO REPORTED WRONGDOING BY THE PUBLIC UTILITY TO THE OFFICE OF REGULATORY STAFF; AND BY ADDING SECTION 8-27-90 SO AS TO PROVIDE REMEDIES IF A PUBLIC UTILITY TAKES ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTION AGAINST AN EMPLOYEE WHO REPORTED WRONGDOING.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:
SECTION 1.   This act may be cited as the "Rate Payer Protection Act".
SECTION 2.   Chapter 27, Title 8 of the S.C. Code is amended by adding:
   Section 8-27-70.   For purposes of Sections 8-27-80 and 8-27-90:
   (1) "Public utility" means public utility as defined in Sections 58-3-5(6) and 58-33-20(6), the South Carolina Public Service Authority, and electric cooperatives.
   (2) "Employee" means an employee of a public utility.
   (3) "Report" means:
      (a) a written or oral allegation made to the Office of Regulatory Staff of waste or wrongdoing that contains the following information:
         (i)      the date of disclosure;
         (ii)   the name of the employee making the report; and
         (iii)   the nature of the wrongdoing and the date or range of dates on which the wrongdoing allegedly occurred. A report must be made within one hundred eighty days of the date the reporting employee first learns of the alleged wrongdoing; or
      (b) sworn testimony regarding wrongdoing, regardless of when the wrongdoing allegedly occurred, given to any standing committee, subcommittee of a standing committee, oversight committee, oversight subcommittee, or study committee of the Senate or the House of Representatives.
      (c) If a report is made to the Office of Regulatory Staff, the employing public utility must be notified as soon as practicable by the Office of Regulatory Staff.
   (5) "Wrongdoing" means action by a public utility which results in substantial abuse, misuse, destruction, or loss of substantial public utility funds or public utility resources. "Wrongdoing" also includes an allegation that a public utility has intentionally violated federal or state statutory law or regulations or other political subdivision ordinances or regulations or a code of ethics, which violation is not merely technical or of a minimum nature.
   Section 8-27-80.   (A) A public utility may not dismiss, suspend from employment, demote, or decrease the compensation of an employee of a public utility because the employee files a report of wrongdoing with the Office of Regulatory Staff. If the Office of Regulatory Staff determines the employee's report is unfounded, or amounts to a mere technical violation, and is not made in good faith, the public utility may take disciplinary action including termination. Any public utility covered by this chapter may impose disciplinary sanctions, in accordance with its internal disciplinary procedures, against any of its direct line supervisory employees who retaliate against another employee for having filed a good faith report under this chapter.
   (B) Notwithstanding the filing of a report pursuant to this chapter, a public utility may dismiss, suspend, demote, or decrease the compensation of an employee for causes independent of the filing of a protected report as described in this section.
   Section 8-27-90.   If an employee is dismissed, suspended from employment, demoted, or receives a decrease in compensation, within one year after having timely reported an alleged wrongdoing under this chapter, the employee may institute a nonjury civil action against the employing public utility for:
      (1) reinstatement to his former position;
      (2) lost wages;
      (3) actual damages not to exceed fifteen thousand dollars; and
      (4) reasonable attorney's fees as determined by the court. This award of attorney's fees may not exceed ten thousand dollars for a trial and five thousand dollars for an appeal. The action must be brought in the court of common pleas of the county in which the employment action occurred. An action may not be brought under this chapter unless the employee has exhausted all available grievance or other administrative remedies, and any previous proceedings have resulted in a finding that the employee would not have been disciplined but for the reporting of alleged wrongdoing.
   (B) An action under this chapter must be commenced within one year after the accrual of the cause of action or exhaustion of all available grievance or other administrative and judicial remedies or is forever barred.
SECTION 3.   This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.

 

We strongly support H.3614, the SC Ratepayer Protection Act. This is an omnibus energy reform and overhaul bill that is an amalgamation of several other stand-alone bills we have been following in past years.

The following is an overview of the bill.

  • Establishes new Code:
    • Protecting public utility employee whistleblowers.
    • Ensuring there are no conflicts of interest with the new ratepayer protection advocate, the Consumer Advocate within the Department of Consumer Affairs.
    • Ensuring necessary staff for and appropriate qualifications, remittance, consultation, continuing education and outlined conflicts of interest of SC Public Service Commission (PSC) Commissioners, as well as an appropriate review period of the Commissioners.
    • Ensuring appropriate qualifications for PSC Commissioners.
    • Ensuring the PSC is granted approval by the SC Public Utilities Review Committee (PURC) prior to hiring third party advisors.
    • Overhauling the PURC by removing any financial or familial conflicts of interests and expanding the committee composition.
    • Ensuring appropriate qualifications for and removal of conflicts of interest for the leadership of the ORS.

South Carolina Sierra Club

Because this bill has already passed out of the SC state House of Representatives, please contact your SC state Senator and ask them to support this bill.

Having been the lead organization fighting to stop the V.C. Summer boondoggle from its outset through its ensuing disaster, in addition to being the lead state environmental organization working to protect ratepayers and promote renewable sources of energy, the SC Sierra Club asks the SC General Assembly to pass this bill to ensure nothing like V.C. Summer ever happens again.